Do all brands have to lose 90% of sales to generics ? Not necessarily

The US Pharma industry often regards drugs with generic competition to be at the end of their promotional lifetimes. As we prepare for an onslaught of new generics over the next 18 months, Cegedim explores how generics have impacted promotional strategy for some of America’s most prescribed molecules. Despite active generic competition, Pfizer’s blood pressure medication Norvasc is still actively promoted through a variety of channels as is Merck’s lipid-lowering drug Zocor. Much smaller on the promotion scale is BMS’ Glucophage which barely outspends its generic competitors.

The success story amoung US brands for maintaining significant prescription market share against competitors is Abbott’s Synthroid – dwarfing the promotional spending of its nearest generic competitor by eight times. Synthroid’s messages about “constant bioavailability” and “the difference in trade-name Synthroid and generics” are effective with physicians. Abbott also uses coupon programs to keep Synthroid’s pricing attractive to consumers.

To view their press release – Pharmaceutical Marketing Expenditure Trends:  https://www.cegedimstrategicdata.com/Press/Documents/CSD%202010%20Pharmaceutical%20Marketing%20Expenditure%20July%202011.pdf

 

One Response to Do all brands have to lose 90% of sales to generics ? Not necessarily

  1. Pingback: Do all brands have to lose 90% of sales to generics ? Not necessarily | Pharma Marketer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>